The Day I Realized Why Most EdTech Startups Stay Small — and Why This Time Might Be Different
For years I’ve watched the Learning & Development (L&D) space split into hundreds of tiny vendors — microlearning builders, LMSs of various niche (internal, sales enablement, Partner enablement, L&D, local/global market, enterprise v.s SMB), roleplay simulators, video tools, compliance platforms, and so on.
Each company seems to solve a small, valid problem… and yet, very few ever scale. They either bootstrap, or seedstrap.
Until recently, I didn’t fully understand why.
The Structural Mismatch
The real reason most EdTech companies stay small isn’t lack of vision or product quality.
It’s a structural mismatch between how the L&D industry adopts tools and how venture capital expects returns.
VCs need their portfolio companies to follow a triple-triple-double-double-double trajectory. That means exponential growth, fast adoption, and high expansion revenue.
L&D buyers, on the other hand, move at a glacial pace:
- Long buying cycles
- Low per-seat pricing
- “Nice-to-have” (not mission-critical) positioning
- Renewal once a year at best
- Seat-based v.s Seller-based
That’s a recipe for death-by-slow-motion. The economics simply don’t line up.
So what happens?
Small teams build narrow tools, bootstrap themselves, get profitable enough to survive, but never grow fast enough to attract serious capital.
Founders stay perpetually “occupied” — always selling, supporting, and maintaining, never scaling.
That’s why the space looks like a graveyard of niche products — perfectly fine, but perpetually fragmented.
Why It Might Finally Change
Here’s where the shift happens.
Since 2022, AI has fundamentally changed the physics of how content is created.
What used to require separate tools — for e-learning, videos, microlearning, blogs, even roleplay — can now be unified in one workbench.
AI collapsed the cost of creation and destroyed the boundary between formats.
You no longer need five tools — just one intelligent layer orchestrating different content nodes.
This unification matters because it aligns the L&D market with the VC model for the first time ever:
| VC Growth Logic | Old L&D Tools | AI Unified Workbench |
|---|---|---|
| Speed of adoption | Slow, sales-driven | Fast, product-led |
| Margins | Medium (service-heavy) | High (automated generation) |
| Expansion revenue | Limited | Modular upsell (Video, Micro, Blog, Roleplay) |
| Customer stickiness | Low | High — the entire workflow lives inside one tool |
AI turned “training” from an offline service into a scalable product engine.
Why It Matters Now
The companies emerging in this wave — AI-native SaaS, compliance tech, customer education tools — don’t have legacy baggage.
They’re starting from scratch, with no old content libraries or outdated LMSs to migrate.
That’s what makes this moment different.
This is the first time in twenty years that EdTech tools can grow fast enough to make sense for venture capital.
It’s not that the market changed — the physics did.
Related posts
